consider, respond to, or evaluate on an SQR of yours?
My concern about SQR’s were how to star the summaries and how to fits all the information in two hundred words, Also when answering the question it was difficult because in order to have a good response in my case I need to find a relation to the topic, a personal experience or put myself in the situation. I would like for my peers to respond with the truth and for them to read and ask me any questions about what I wrote if is not clear, in order for them to give me feedbacks or any opinions on how to change anything that could be fixed or make better.
2. How did you see/evaluate the comments you made on your peers’ papers?
Honestly, do you think they were really helpful? (It’s ok that you can say no. If
That’s the case, please state what made you unable to provide specific
Comments as you wished. It’s important for me to know how carefully you read
Your peers’ papers and how did you work on commenting your friends’ papers).
When I comment on my peers papers I think that most of the times I comment about the grammar and punctuation instead of reading more into the reading to check if they were actually answering the questions or if it was related to the topic. Which I honestly think they weren’t very helpful because I didn’t give very helpful feedbacks that would help them fixed their paper. I did read the papers but sometimes it was hard to understand so we would most likely make changes so the sentences would sound better or the grammar.
